Whether a financial institution is a small community credit union or a large, complex bank, the Board of Directors and senior management have a fundamental responsibility to oversee safety, soundness and strategic direction. Traditionally, board reporting has focused on financial conditions such as capital levels, loan growth, loan-to-deposit ratios and earnings performance. While these remain essential, they no longer tell the full story of an institution’s risk profile or future competitiveness.
Electronic payments have become central to how clients move money and how financial institutions manage operational, credit, compliance and fraud risk. Yet in my role as an ACH and payments auditor, I still routinely hear that little to nothing about payments activity is reported to management or the board. Payments are often treated as purely operational, something management “does not care about” unless a problem arises.
That mindset no longer aligns with today’s payments environment.
Payments Activity Is a Strategic Indicator
Payments channels such as ACH, wires, remote deposit capture (RDC), card payments and instant payments like the RTP® Network and the FedNow® Service provide valuable insight into client behavior, operational risk and future service needs. Payments activity should directly inform board-level discussions on strategy, technology investment, risk appetite and growth opportunities.
My perspective has evolved over time, beginning when the primary focus was ACH origination activity. Initially, management wanted simple growth metrics: how many originated ACH transactions exist and whether volumes were increasing. That expanded into interest in inbound ACH volumes, and later into trending analysis for RDC businesses and cash management clients.
Each step deepened the conversation. Management began asking better questions — not just about volume, but whether the financial institution was meeting client payment needs and preparing for what comes next.
The Rise of Instant Payments Changes the Conversation
Today, we are firmly in the era of instant payments. Many financial institutions are comfortable receiving instant payments but remain cautious about enabling outbound functionality. Even so, growth in received RTP® and FedNow® volumes tells an important story.
Inbound instant payment activity reflects changing client expectations and unmet demand for faster payment options. Boards should recognize that received volumes are not low risk background noise; they are trend indicators that may signal the need for new services, updated pricing strategies or adjustments to fraud and liquidity management.
As with ACH, both origination and receipt volumes matter. If reporting focuses solely on outbound activity, leadership misses half the picture.
What Should Be Included in Board-Level Payments Reporting
Effective board reporting on payments does not require lengthy operational detail. It requires clarity, trend visibility and alignment with risk and strategy. Key elements should include:
1. Volume and Trend Analysis by Payment Channel: Boards should see quarterly trend analyses for major payment types, including ACH, wires, RDC and instant payments, broken down into origination and receipt where applicable. Simple line graphs and bar charts showing movement over time are far more useful than static volume totals. The goal is not to overwhelm the board with data but to help them recognize patterns, ask questions and understand how clients are using payment channels.
2. Channel Shifts and Client Behavior: Reporting should highlight material shifts between payment channels. For example, declining check usage paired with increased ACH or instant payments can inform strategic planning and technology investment decisions. Payments data is one of the clearest indicators of evolving client needs.
3. Risk and Audit Summary Reporting: Audit results and risk assessments tied to payments should be summarized at a high level. Boards need visibility into key strengths, notable weaknesses and management’s remediation plans, not a lengthy audit report buried in board materials. A concise executive summary supports effective oversight without unnecessary detail.
4. Exposure and Limit Oversight: Boards should understand how exposure limits are established and reviewed for ACH originators, wire beneficiaries, RDC merchants and instant payment senders. This includes acknowledging that these limits are not just operational controls — they reflect credit risk, due diligence and overall risk appetite.
Aligning Payments, Operations and Lending
While payments are typically managed within operations or treasury management, lender engagement is critical. When exposure limits are exceeded or new limits are requested, the full client relationship must be considered. Lenders often have the most complete view of a client’s financial condition and cash flow needs, making their involvement essential to effective risk management.
Unfortunately, many financial institutions struggle with alignment. Too often, exposure limit approvals occur without adequate origination due diligence or approval requests are ignored altogether. This disconnect weakens risk controls and leaves operations teams carrying exposure without proper support.
Boards should be aware of this challenge and ensure expectations are clearly defined across operations, lending and risk management functions.
Making Payments Reporting Matter
The most effective board reporting makes payments data visual, relevant and tied to strategy. Trend lines, charts and concise summaries bring the story to life and prompt meaningful questions. Payments data should help boards understand where risk is increasing, where client demand is shifting and where investment or realignment may be needed.
Static numbers inform. Trends drive insight.
Electronic payments are no longer back-office utilities; they are a strategic lens into operational risk, client behavior and the future of financial services. When boards receive the right information in the right format, they are far better equipped to guide their institutions through an increasingly complex payments landscape.
Download this checklist to help strengthen board and senior management oversight of electronic payments, support strategic discussions and provide a practical framework for payments reporting across your financial institution.
|
|
Outdated policies causing chaos behind the scenes? That’s the kind of mess no hero team should have to deal with. A Policy & Procedure Review with our expert team helps you clean things up, strengthen compliance and get your operations running like a well-trained super squad. Ready to power up your processes? Suit up and connect with our Advisory Team to get a free, no-obligation |